Musing

This shall be my shortest post ever. Here's a question:

I wonder if reading the Narnia series' particular brand of mythopoeia as allegory is reductionistic and ultimately stagnating. What do you think?

Three-Dimensional Human Beings

Well, the posts here have been few and far in between. There's a lot of reasons for this, I suppose, when one sits down to think about it. I'm often very tired and my brain is mush; I haven't much time for reading and reflecting, and, in generally, don't have much time which isn't taken up with work, or friends/family, or just sleeping.

Perhaps it's a sign of intellectual rigour (what little muscle I had!) gone to flab. More positively, perhaps I am spending more time "out there" in the real world, with people, than sitting at home in front of the computer by myself.

In the final analysis, however, it boils down to "I ain't got much to say."

I do seem, however to have ample time to check Facebook, post articles, and click through the various albums of "a friend's friend's cousin's little sister's photos of her trip to that hip bar in Boronia."

Hmmm!

The internet is taking over my life!

While there's merit in just taking time to unwind, and allowing your brain to rest by clicking through a collection of cool photos on the internet, there comes to a point where you're simply wasting time. (Sounds obvious, huh?)

I've been mulling on the words of writer and English professor Alan Jacobs. On the enormous amount of internet "sharing" (blogs, FB updates, Flickr &c.) and passive online consumption that goes on, he comments:

What is necessary, I think, is for all of us to be engaged in some activity that challenges us, that tests our intellectual limits. For some people that might be reading Tolstoy, while for others it might involve writing code or learning Klingon. But as Lanier says, “You have to be somebody before you can share yourself,” and being somebody is an achievement. It requires intentional labor, and a degree of personal ambition — and anyone can work and strive, though some have farther to go than others. But a lot of fooling around on the internet is just that, fooling around: it doesn't test our resources or stretch our capacities. In many cases that’s fine, because we shouldn't be working all the time: but even if fooling around on the internet really does somehow increase social creative capital — which I have no reason to believe — it doesn't achieve a damned thing for the person doing it.

I ain't got nothing to say, because there's not much of me that is solid, and substantial.

Jacobs is a Christian, and no doubt hidden behind this statement is also a theology of humanity, that sees the inherent richness in each person - beyond personality, beyond mere intellectualism - that comes when we lose ourselves in Christ. He who created us knows that we are beyond a body to be fed, a functioning participant of society. We are ourselves, fearfully and wonderfully made, and there is no-one like us. Only, paradoxically, one must give away blindly, throwing 'self' away, to receive the mind and likeness of Christ, and in him made fully ourselves. For who knows us better than God who made us, "intentioned" us in our mother's womb?

Give up your self, and you will find your real self. Lose your life and you will save it. Submit to death, death of your ambitions and favourite wishes every day and death of your whole body in the end: submit with every fibre of your being, and you will find eternal life. Keep back nothing. Nothing that you have not given away will ever be really yours. Nothing in you that has not died will ever be raised from the dead. Look for yourself, and you will find in the long run only hatred, loneliness, despair, rage, ruin, and decay. But look for Christ and you will find Him, and with Him everything else thrown in. - CS Lewis.

Then he said to them all: "If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take up his cross daily and follow me. For whoever wants to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for me will save it. - Jesus.

On Revivals and History Lectures

Tonight I attended the annual Charles Perry lecture at Ridley College. Named for the 1st bishop of St. James' Old Cathedral, the lecture series began in the 1990s; was abandoned some time after; and was then resurrected last year, with its inaugural speaker being no less that the Scottish historian David Bebbington.

The purpose of the lectures is for evangelicals to reflect and learn from their past.

As we were celebrating the 100 birthday of Ridley College, the lecture this year was on the state of evangelicalism in Victoria in and around 1910, with a particular concentration of the revivals that were happening around this period.

There was a lot of stuff going on - dates; references back to revivals in Britain and the US in the 18th and 19th century; influential figures who travelled to Australia ...But what I got out of the lecture were 2 things:

- Revivals happen because of prayer. "Extra-ordinary Prayer Concerts" was the phrase often employed to describe committed groups of Christians, gathering together regularly to pray specifically for God to work. These prayer meetings often lasted for years, before seeing fruit in revivals. They were also serious commitments. The Moravians, for instance, took shifts in praying, so that they were literally "praying unceasingly" day in, and day out.

- With regards to theology, all the leaders of the great revivals (Wesley, Edwards, Whitfield et al), had a sense of following in the footsteps the theology of the Reformers of the 16th century, without emendation. There was, however, one additional point which proved crucial: they were all deeply convinced that what happened at Pentecost with the Apostles could, and indeed, should be replicated in their current situations, within their community of believers. Their understanding of the Holy Spirit and what he could do in the present day was therefore paramount to fueling their revivals.

I came away from the evening with a deep sense of the power and need for prayer, before we come up with any strategies for how we do mission, or evangelism, or attempt to "transform the world for God."

Of course, the lecture raised more questions than it could possibly answer. Being a total ignoramus when it came to revivals, I wanted to know what exactly constituted a revival? And how do we measure, historically, what was a period of revival or not?

What is our theology of the Holy Spirit? Should we plead for revival now? And why didn't the 16th Century Reformers go for revivals, Day of Pentecost style? (Actually they were probably preoccupied with clearing the air re: Salvation by Faith alone - which the 18th century benefitted from).

******************

For someone who was reading the lecture out word for word, the speaker was quite engaging and clear in his presentation. However, the lecture would have confirmed the general suspicion amongst the populus, that, while history is Very Important and We Need to Know about It, the past is entirely and utterly Dull.

I hasten to add, that I doubt I could have done better with the material - dense and statistical - but it did lead me to ponder what makes a good lecture, and, in particular, a good history lecture.

Here are some thoughts, in no particular order:

1. judicial use of visuals: Speaking about historical figures is always so much more interesting when you chuck up a portrait or two, and there are so many wonderful paintings if you're in the right period.

2. ditto audio material (I once attended a lecture on Elizabethan England at the beginning of which the lecturer gave us a fine baritone rendition of "Greensleeves". It was relevant too!)

3. beware of chronology, for it's likely to slip into "and this happened, and then this person did this, and then this happened."

4. include funny anecdotes and quotations to "colour" the past (and because the truth is always stranger than fiction).

5. indicate at the beginning of your lecture the lay of the land - what you're going to cover, splitting the history thematically, if possible.

6. explain why you're covering the ground you're covering, and wherever possible, help make analytical links for your audience.

7. be excited! History is a great and exciting story, about real people, real passions, and often situations that no fiction writer could dream up. Tell it therefore as the ripping yarn that it is.

Summer Solstice in Berlin

There's a time between dusk and dark, where the clouds over the city of Berlin gather like a pluckered garment, and the fading light dyes the entire city an eerie blue. This is the best time to travel across Berlin on a train - over the Spree River, catching glimpses of various catherdral tops, jutting out like sharpened pencils from out of the darkening depth beneath your carriage.

And I am struck once again by how wonderful this city is. It's not that Berlin is particularly beautiful - it isn't. There's no magic that hangs over it like it does over Paris: everything picturesque and infused with some marvellous bubbly stuff that makes one swing one's hair, and over-gesticulate (shrug, demonstrate insouciance by a mere flick of the hand, jut out your lower lip as you drawl out "Ben, [long pause, maybe time for another shrug] .... oui). Nor does it have the rugged and gothic grandeur of Edinburgh - the craggy hills always in the distance, even as you wind yourself down another wee cobbled close.

Berlin is flat, spread out. A vast cacaphony of Schinkel architecture, Corinthian towers and 18th century splendour. Bauhaus, communist high-rise flats, memorials and monuments to battles lost and won, bombed out shells of churches and monasteries, expensive shopping centres, all neighbourly with the latest and rebuilding, covering over scars left by the war.

Having just spent two days in the baroque harmony of Leipzig, with its churches that pay homage to Bach and Luther, I felt dizzy and irritated. Berlin is mad, messy, loud.

It's only when I stop trying for cohesion, that Berlin woos me, once more.

Berlin is not uniformly elegant, nor quaintly historical, though there is more history here than can be recounted. It is uncomfortable and confronting, and in its dissonance a strange beauty. It's the most alive city I've ever been to.

Everything here has a story. Most of it not pleasant, but all entirely human. Berlin is split into 12 Bezirke, or boroughs, and each has a distinct flavour of its own. Here's just a few, to taste. Tiergarten in the east is gentil, with wide, tree-lined streets. Kreuzberg is famous for its large Turkish population, and the best place for a 3 euro Doner Kebab. Mitte is the tourist centre, with checkpoint Charlie, the Holocaust monument, and three glorious museums on an island on the river ... the wide street that leads to Brandenburg gate is called - delicious evocation! - "under the Linden trees". My favourite quarter is Prenzlauer Berg, the rent being still cheap enough for artists and musicians to hang around.

Broken Bells

Divest of beauty
The day crawls

Night edges out boredom
And lethargy takes its place

The ship has sailed
The glory departed

What is left but burnt cinder
And a cold cup of tea
left unattended?

This leaden body
This lenten season

This self-conscious word
This selfish soul

Languishing disaster.

And yet ...
When we cry out:
O God save us!
From the horror
From the terror of the midday shadow
From ourselves

You came.

infinity and eternity
reduced into a child's body.

This flesh, this blood.
Eat, drink.

Obsessions

Tomorrow I have to do a devotion in staff meeting with my colleagues. This involves selecting a passage from the bible, and reflecting on it for the benefit of the rest of staff. Sort of like a biblestudy, but much briefer, and more personal in content.

We've been studying the book of Luke in some of the students' bible study groups, so it's a case of 2 birds and 1 stone that we've also been using it as the scripture text for devos. I've been encouraged enormously by the ones that the other staff have done. They've taken the parables of Jesus, and challenged me enormously on my use of money, my trust in God's mercy for the day's bread and work, my passion for the spread of the gospel, in light of the reality of judgment.

So what am I going to talk about? I have no idea. I'm reading through Luke now, trying to gain a whole picture of the text. Partly this sense of empty-headedness comes from not knowing my scripture well enough, nor applying it hard enough in my life. One lesson I've learnt from one of my colleagues is the practice of looking at my life - examining the minutae, for it isn't mundane to God. She is adept on reflecting, as the Psalmists do, on the past mercies of God in her life, and drawing upon them, as from a well-spring, when she's dry.

But thinking about Luke, and the Gospels in general, the story that immediately comes to mind is the Transfiguration. I realised that I am a bit obsessed with the Transfiguration story. It is such a strange story. In a book that feels functional - full of parables that need to be worked out, like puzzles, it's a conudrum of a different kind. Why is it there? Why does the disciples witness it? Are not the miracles of Christ enough? Why the blinding light? The glory?

Perhaps it's there to remind the disciples that Christ is beautiful. That the future is bright. That eternity is beckoning. It's to pull the curtain aside for one moment, and see who Christ is.

That glory is not just revealed in deed, but on the imagination.

A Farewell to Arms

"Patience," said my friend, "is a virtue. And everything depends on right timing."

"That's real deep." I exclaimed, laughing. "And applicable to so many situations."

"I know." She smirked.


**********

Right timing is very important when it comes to our hot water system. A delicate work of surgery precision, every movement is registered, and has a resultant effect. Taking a shower has become a matter of strategic planning, as my housemates and I swap our various tactics against either an early death from pneumonia, or a hospital stay due to third degree burns.

My housemates all have different systems in place to combat this. Between munches of toast I discover that one housemate opts for the simple water-saving option. Just have quick showers, he says. In and out. Another relies on the precision of geometry: one twist of the hot tap anti-clockwise, and then 3 rapid turns of the cold. I measure heat by the number of body limbs washed. One clean arm and two legs under the lukewarm hot tap, and then it's time to turn on the cold water tap before I burn to death.

We are military strategists, the four of us. We plan our lines of attack, and, armed with towel, sponge and rubber ducky, plunge into the deluge. Mostly we emerge clean, pink and steamily triumphant. A few times, with a roar of pain or a shriek of shock, we stumble out, admitting defeat by the flaying of arms to keep the circulation going. Sometimes the white towel is hoised, and a truce is called. No time for conditioner, but at least the soap's been washed off.

My fourth housemate won't put up with it though. My morning shower, he explains, is like other people's morning coffee. Necessary. Like a good diplomat, he has surveyed the scene, observed the carnage, and decided its time we put down our arms and appeal to a higher authority.

He is right in his wisdom. We'll be ringing the landlord tomorrow.